Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755659AbYG1MiS (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:38:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752330AbYG1MiI (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:38:08 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:36773 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751012AbYG1MiH (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:38:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:37:49 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: OGAWA Hirofumi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: Fix SCHED_HRTICK dependency Message-ID: <20080728123749.GE5515@elte.hu> References: <87wsj71sad.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wsj71sad.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 0.5 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.3819] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 482 Lines: 16 * OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > Hi, > > Currently, it seems SCHED_HRTICK allowed for !SMP. But, it seems to > have no dependency of it. So how about the following? applied to tip/sched/urgent, thanks! Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/