Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 03:13:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 03:13:41 -0500 Received: from khms.westfalen.de ([62.153.201.243]:61406 "EHLO khms.westfalen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 03:13:31 -0500 Date: 24 Jan 2002 08:59:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <8HSVvR$1w-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Why not "attach" patches? X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh8 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? In-Reply-To: X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin) wrote on 22.01.02 in : > The common ground most people seems to be able to accept is: > > a. Go ahead and make patches as attachments, if your MUA makes it easier; > b. Be bloody certain they're text/plain attachments. ... and that they have Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit or 8bit. *Not* quoted-printable or base64. Which means that you lose if the patch contains chars whose 8th bit is set, if any MTA between you and Linus/Alan/etc. doesn't like that. Which is not quite unlikely. (But most MUAs won't allow you to send something like that anyway.) MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/