Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760713AbYG1Sww (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:52:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757402AbYG1Swk (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:52:40 -0400 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:41729 "EHLO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755500AbYG1Swj (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:52:39 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: EQLXNB6ny6WLiZyBFjlXGjDImBivmhEnqz7W67N6HY/j 1217271157 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:52:33 -0300 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh To: Dan Williams Cc: Philip Langdale , Ivo van Doorn , LKML , Matthew Garrett , toshiba_acpi@memebeam.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] toshiba_acpi: Add support for bluetooth toggling through rfkill Message-ID: <20080728185233.GB26564@khazad-dum.debian.net> References: <488CBBAB.6010508@overt.org> <200807272259.44364.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <488CF6D8.6000700@overt.org> <20080728030437.GC10672@khazad-dum.debian.net> <1217243863.24609.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1217243863.24609.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1643 Lines: 33 On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Dan Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 00:04 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Philip Langdale wrote: > > > Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > >> You don't seem to be using rfkill_force_state() which is required to inform the rfkill > > >> layer about the state changes. > > > > > > Hmm? According to rfkill.txt, one can either use force_state() or implement the > > > get_state() hook, and I have done the later. If this is not the correct method, > > > can you please explain when I should be using force_state? > > > > There is a bunch of rfkill bug fix patches that was not merged in > > wireless-testing yet (which is a pity, it would be really good if they could > > go into 2.6.27). One of those patches fixes the docs to make it clear that > > Lots of wireless people (including John) were at OLS this past week, so > it's not entirely surprising that patch merging might have been slow. That would explain it, yes... Well, I sure hope this means the patches still have a non-zero chance of being sent to mainline for 2.6.27 :-) I am not up to date on how merges are usually handled in the wireless and net subsystems. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/