Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754828AbYG2DXm (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:23:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752297AbYG2DXd (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:23:33 -0400 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27]:1780 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752244AbYG2DXc (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:23:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=jqTpuc0rwEDe+zRDmN88RBYmDFheD/oHIQcH4t7fyr5IeWmExJa/3FNPw1PSAm8+r9 t4/gheuC0vNkqcL4FpUYtMTHwwVRcnbbL0gCyIJ0ov6rrQKbEMU7F/0r0Af6vGPUQunf 8qmDPSBHjfBgm7uqI0EOqleoZEbMX9K6a0u1A= Message-ID: <9e4733910807282023h5479c755wde55e2324909b678@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:23:31 -0400 From: "Jon Smirl" To: "Theodore Tso" , "Al Viro" , lkml Subject: Re: 463 kernel developers missing! In-Reply-To: <20080729025016.GT9378@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <488DFD97.7080802@simon.arlott.org.uk> <488E0BB6.7020006@simon.arlott.org.uk> <9e4733910807281119m10f9b6e3v98fc892a42476c86@mail.gmail.com> <488E1147.5040803@simon.arlott.org.uk> <9e4733910807281200m25f7f16bwa6678694bb25a61@mail.gmail.com> <20080729011526.GF28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <9e4733910807281825v42f9700al420ba48aebf3d790@mail.gmail.com> <20080729013650.GG28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <9e4733910807281901i1a39ce93v902dd6bd240e1a34@mail.gmail.com> <20080729025016.GT9378@mit.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1642 Lines: 36 On 7/28/08, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:01:06PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > > I should also point out that external information (Google) was needed > > to identify several hundred names, there was insufficient information > > in the log or kernel source. If we have to reconstruct this mapping > > ten years from now for some random lawsuit, the external information > > may not be there. > > > Jon, > > The reality is ten years from now, many e-mail addresses won't > be accurate anyway. We will have to track people down by hand, if it > ever comes down to that. The signed-off-by needs to be enough so we > can track down someone (very likely only a few set of people); via a > manual method is quite acceptable. I don't think it is really > necessary to try force fit the signed-off-by just so we can collect > better mode. The kernel already has a mailmap file, but it is not complete. So I should just take this work that makes the mailmap file a lot better and throw it away? The policy is that the log file should be messed up enough so that a computer can't process it and that a human can recover it only with several day's effort? That's a really hard line to define and we'll probably lose the identity of a bunch of contributors. I'll follow up with a patch that deletes the current .mailmap -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/