Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:58:15 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure
Message-ID: <20080729085815.GA1301@elte.hu>
References: <20080729162300.733b3e09.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080729080055.GA28916@elte.hu> <20080729180317.94c64634.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080729180317.94c64634.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 694
Lines: 23


* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:00:55 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > -#define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) ({ *get_cpu_mask(cpu); })
> > > +#define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) (*get_cpu_mask(cpu))
> > 
> > hm, i'm wondering - is this a compiler bug?
> 
> Or maybe a deficiency in such an old compiler (v3.4.5) but the fix 
> makes sense anyway, right?

yeah, i was just wondering.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/