Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:18:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:18:15 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-085.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.85]:21923 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:18:00 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Giacomo Catenazzi Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2-2.1.3 is available Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 22:45:52 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20020115145324.A5772@thyrsus.com> <3C4C4A60.7030700@dplanet.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On January 22, 2002 12:11 am, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On January 21, 2002 06:05 pm, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: > > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > > > I detect a slight lack of symmetry here, shouldn't it be "make > > > autoconfig"? Pardon me if this has been beaten to^W^W discussed above. > > > > Yes. It should be "make autoconfig", for symmterty reasons :-) > > I called the files and the project autoconfigure, because > > 'autoconfig' is already an utility made by GNU. (not related > > to kernel) > > This is kernel autoconfig, different namespace, same idea. I don't think > you have a problem. Besides, last time I checked, autoconfig wasn't > copyrighted. Oh wait, the 'real autoconf' is called autoconf, not autoconfig (duh) so there is no reason at all to avoid 'make autoconfig'. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/