Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759588AbYG2Ru5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:50:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753209AbYG2Rut (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:50:49 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:60212 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753172AbYG2Rus (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:50:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:50:43 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Andi Kleen , Mike Galbraith , Frederik Deweerdt , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, Ingo Molnar , jblunck@suse.de Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000002 Message-ID: <20080729175043.GA11196@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20080725095317.GA12636@skywalker> <20080728222643.GA6339@slug> <1217305335.5553.3.camel@marge.simson.net> <20080729120911.GI30344@one.firstfloor.org> <20080729065635.27630e33@infradead.org> <20080729145348.GN30344@one.firstfloor.org> <20080729083029.094a32cb@infradead.org> <20080729163113.GP30344@one.firstfloor.org> <20080729102251.22ac8543@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080729102251.22ac8543@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1204 Lines: 30 > That's not what datacenter people say. As long as power gain is bigger > than performance loss.. they tend to want it. That's a special case. It's fine but they should explicitely configure it. I suspect even the data center people prefer "opt in" versus "opt out" here. > Also "significantly" is extremely subjective, like in this case it can > be a win or a loss, depending. My impression is that the losses are more likely than the wins here. > > > When the user says impacting performance > > is ok then doing that is fine of course, but not by default. > > that's a fine kernel policy. > > Distros will override this policy if their users tell them they're > willing to do the tradeoff.. they will pick that default. In fact.. > that's a big part of their job.. I'm not fully convinced that was done intentionally in this case. If there's an explicit setting somewhere that's fine anyways, but I think here it more looks like a mistake. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/