Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760129AbYG2VJv (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:09:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754629AbYG2VJo (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:09:44 -0400 Received: from smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl ([213.51.146.201]:56185 "EHLO smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752679AbYG2VJn (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:09:43 -0400 Message-ID: <488F87AB.9080309@keyaccess.nl> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:12:11 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, Simon Arlott , Alan Stern , Daniel Walker Subject: Re: [patch 5/3] fastboot: sync the async execution before late_initcall and move level 6s (sync) first References: <20080720085924.122feb2b@infradead.org> <20080720090041.5924f5ff@infradead.org> <488F84ED.9010200@keyaccess.nl> <20080729140434.31022f55@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20080729140434.31022f55@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1268 Lines: 40 On 29-07-08 23:04, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:00:29 +0200 >> Isn't this a bit confusing? All the other sync levels are directly >> after their respective levels. I can see why you want another level >> now, but shouldn't that mean late_initcall now wants to be 8, >> device_initcall 7 and your new 6s just 6 (device_core_initcall or >> something...)? >> > > yeah it is.. but nobody is using them > > I'll make a note to clean this up > > (by removing the unused ones) Fair enough. By the way: > @@ -775,6 +776,11 @@ static void __init do_initcalls(void) > } > if (phase == 1 && call >= __async_initcall_end) > phase = 2; > + if (phase == 2 && call >= __device_initcall_end) { > + phase = 3; > + /* make sure all async work is done before level 7 */ > + flush_workqueue(async_init_wq); > + } > if (phase != 1) > do_one_initcall(*call); After this patch, there are now 2 flush_workqueue(async_init_wq) calls in do_initcalls. Should the other one remain as well? Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/