Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:14:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:13:48 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:11783 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:13:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:13:13 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Olaf Dietsche Cc: , Subject: Re: White Paper on the Linux kernel VM? In-Reply-To: <873d0vss8y.fsf@tigram.bogus.local> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24 Jan 2002, Olaf Dietsche wrote: > Denis Vlasenko writes: > > > Writing docs wastes developer's time: they will write how they want VM to > > operate or how they think it operates (while some bug can make actual VM > > operate differently) instead of improving/debugging current VM code. > > I don't want to judge, wether writing docs wastes developer's > time. Not writing docs wastes other developers' time. Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/