Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:27:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:27:35 -0500 Received: from dial249.pm3abing3.abingdonpm.naxs.com ([216.98.75.249]:64407 "EHLO ani.animx.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:27:24 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:35:58 -0500 From: Wakko Warner To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.4.16 Message-ID: <20020124123558.A19899@animx.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org recent 2.4 kernels seem to love eating away at memory. After 2 weeks of uptime, 2.2.19 would normally consume about 120mb of ram and maybe 1mb of swap. With 2.4.16 it's more than doubled. Swap usage is 128mb, memory useage about 230mb. Nothing is different between what I ran with 2.2 and what I run now with 2.4. Is linux trying to do memory consumtion like windows now? The other odd thing is, when I go to single user (init 1), I still have 100-120mb memory used. Only thing running is the shell init and kernel processes. This is after all modules have been unloaded as well (my kernel only has what it takes to mount / and nothing more) Where is this memory going? I shouldn't have THAT much used with nothing running. memory: 512mb swap: 130mb (2 65mb partitions on scsi) -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/