Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:36:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:36:15 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:46864 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:36:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:35:33 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Wakko Warner Cc: Subject: Re: 2.4.16 In-Reply-To: <20020124123558.A19899@animx.eu.org> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Wakko Warner wrote: > recent 2.4 kernels seem to love eating away at memory. After 2 weeks of > uptime, 2.2.19 would normally consume about 120mb of ram and maybe 1mb of > swap. With 2.4.16 it's more than doubled. Swap usage is 128mb, memory > useage about 230mb. Nothing is different between what I ran with 2.2 and > what I run now with 2.4. There are known issues with memory management in the main 2.4 kernel. If you have the time, could you please try my -rmap VM or andrea's -aa kernel ? (available from http://surriel.com/patches/ and kernel.org respectively) kind regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/