Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761581AbYG3PXv (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:23:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753426AbYG3PXm (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:23:42 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.224]:53564 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753308AbYG3PXm (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:23:42 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=hB/FoM+D7U6OnOZXRjuouHwPV0La5vRztsCNkmmDqEyYypQNIBf2iaTBwiqwH/BGXH xLcIidJ5bSDMPhLDFsWj5Ti6VY+FJXSE5y5TBuXwfGlxVxuvbH60U5CdIC575ofgDJH7 98nGkzmVWSnQnRrllEpLMFHvj3aVTkDVrLD3I= Message-ID: <9e4733910807300823x516eb45dx877898f9d7c8be57@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:23:41 -0400 From: "Jon Smirl" To: "Alan Cox" Subject: Re: 463 kernel developers missing! Cc: davids@webmaster.com, "Stefan Richter" , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" In-Reply-To: <20080730155359.7c0206f4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4890284E.3050806@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20080730155359.7c0206f4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1799 Lines: 46 On 7/30/08, Alan Cox wrote: > > No, but that all the submissions were made under the GPL, whose explicit purpose is to allow information to be changed, processed, and reused for other purposes does. > > > So why hasn't Jon included a copy of the GPL and the sources with his new > data set ? Bug, obviously the file needs it, it is derived from GPL'd files. Please edit your local copy, no need to send another couple hundred GB of email. > > If you don't want your submissions to be in the public record for all eternity to be used for any lawful purpose, don't make them to a GPL project. > > > The GPL doesn't trump data protection law. It can't. By making a submission to a GPL'd project didn't you grant a license for your data to be used? That was Ted's point when he posted the developer's certification. > > > You have no right whatsoever to look at how one person chooses to use them and say "I didn't agree to that". Yes, you did. You gave up the right to approve or reject each use when you made the submission. If you don't like it, submit under some other license. > > > Disagree - firstly national law trumps licences, secondly there is the > (regrettably increasingly) small matter of manners. > > > Alan > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/