Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:33:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:32:47 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:39685 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:32:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:33:10 -0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Anton Altaparmakov Cc: Jeff Garzik , Linux-Kernel list Subject: Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel Message-ID: <20020124183310.GD27763@conectiva.com.br> Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Anton Altaparmakov , Jeff Garzik , Linux-Kernel list In-Reply-To: <3C5047A2.1AB65595@mandrakesoft.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020124181848.00b23180@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020124181848.00b23180@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Url: http://advogato.org/person/acme Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:22:03PM +0000, Anton Altaparmakov escreveu: > At 17:42 24/01/02, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >Actually I prefer 'bool' to '_Bool', if this becomes a kernel standard. > > I would be in favour of this as it does make code more readable. I use it > in ntfs tng quite a bit (but I just typedef a BOOL type myself). > > If it is added, then _please_ don't use '_Bool', that's just sick... > 'bool', heck even 'BOOL' would be better than that! I'd vote for bool, long are the days when I programmed COBOL in original 3270 terminals, heck it seems like it was in a previous life 8) /me scratches head, I should go back and update the kernel janitor TODO list with this... - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/