Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753575AbYG3Qbc (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:31:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751068AbYG3QbY (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:31:24 -0400 Received: from smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl ([213.51.146.201]:51404 "EHLO smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750818AbYG3QbX (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:31:23 -0400 Message-ID: <489097A4.6000507@keyaccess.nl> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:32:36 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: Linus Torvalds , Stefan Richter , Jon Smirl , Paul Mundt , James Morris , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Theodore Tso , Simon Arlott , lkml Subject: Re: 463 kernel developers missing! References: <20080728234131.GD28055@linux-sh.org> <9e4733910807281714h2918fcbey77c8d1cea902a3fd@mail.gmail.com> <488E644D.7000507@keyaccess.nl> <9e4733910807281750p52cf150lacd0e237732046e7@mail.gmail.com> <488EF377.5080603@keyaccess.nl> <20080730072448.GB1564@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <4890284E.3050806@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20080730124650.GB19966@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <4890646D.3060000@keyaccess.nl> <20080730153247.GA21597@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> In-Reply-To: <20080730153247.GA21597@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1079 Lines: 28 On 30-07-08 17:32, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:54:05PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: >> But let us leave this discussion be. It's not going anywhere anyway. > > There's one thing where it might actually go further: > > You actually have a good point here, and I'm not disagreeing with it. > > I've added Linus to the recipients since stuff like e.g. Tested-by or > Bisected-by tags actually undermine what the DCE 1.1 update should > have accomplished. So if DCE 1.1 (d) is considered to be legally > required for public indefinite storage of name and email address > we have a problem here. I was afraid you'd conclude that... Me, I conclude that we should just not do the "harvest all these addresses into a big file" thing that might make it more than a theoretical problem... But that's just me. Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/