Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759177AbYG3SF7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:05:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752845AbYG3SFw (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:05:52 -0400 Received: from vena.lwn.net ([206.168.112.25]:32842 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751688AbYG3SFv (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:05:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:05:48 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Andrew Morton Cc: LKML , Amanda McPherson Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document Message-ID: <20080730120548.7478917a@bike.lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20080730001508.9095f571.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080729143015.0f79cf37@bike.lwn.net> <20080730001508.9095f571.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.13.5; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1654 Lines: 39 On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:15:08 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > I wonder a bit whether a ./Documentation update is the best way to > present this. Rather than, say, > http://www.kernel.org/read-this.html. The latter may be easier for > you to update, and we won't have the problem of people reading > two-year-old versions of the document. I think LF wants to put it up somewhere; kernel.org is certainly a possibility too. OTOH if it's in the kernel source, others could update it too. I've always really liked the way stuff in Documentation/ stays current... > > +The Linux kernel, at over 6 million lines of code and 2000 active > > +contributors, > > I suspect the "2000 active developers" is a bit hypey. Is a 0.5 > patch/annum developer "active"? I was going with 1.0/year as a working number. The period v2.6.22..v2.6.26 (July 8, 2007 to July 13, 2008) had 2294 distinct contributors. About 1000 of those were a single patch. If we say that >= 2.0 is active, then the number goes to 1200. I could just say "over 1000" and be happy with that, I guess. > Also: if the code is kept out-of-tree then there is a risk that > someone else's similar feature will be merged in mainline. Good point, I'll add that. Everything else you pointed out is good too, consider it all added. After LWN comes out, anyway. Thanks for taking the time to read through it all. jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/