Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755479AbYG3T3U (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:29:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753263AbYG3T3I (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:29:08 -0400 Received: from idcmail-mo2no.shaw.ca ([64.59.134.9]:41828 "EHLO pd5mo1no-dmz.prod.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754046AbYG3T3G (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:29:06 -0400 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=0 a=UPpEl9ePzhy9p6dRbtwA:9 a=gVxXhnTwBZ-nnuZIMNS1d4TgonsA:4 Message-ID: <4890C0FC.7010604@shaw.ca> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:29:00 -0600 From: Robert Hancock User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dimitri Sivanich CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on x86 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 817 Lines: 17 Dimitri Sivanich wrote: > I've heard folks say that hotplug cpu is very reliable. I'm assuming > that's in the context of the x86 architecture. If so, how come > CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is still listed as EXPERIMENTAL in arch/x86/Kconfig? > Should this be changed for the x86 architecture? > > config HOTPLUG_CPU > bool "Support for suspend on SMP and hot-pluggable CPUs (EXPERIMENTAL)" > depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER Yes, it's a bit bizarre that something needed for suspending almost any current laptop is still marked as "experimental".. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/