Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755713AbYG3U15 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:27:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753177AbYG3U1t (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:27:49 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.30]:19436 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752940AbYG3U1r (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:27:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=tvZ0eSfP44343kZqu97UKyir5yDts+AhLH5CaMNLNv0Bm1J/BT/tzu8PETh5OtiB83 VUPXiSa1httTWGyV9rR4vYi4rzLDuJnHmLlaWu0GnxL/Nnci6hsybbJx/o0ZYjcB9cpT QQhldivn5J8J28pah+SMP42/EHmDFfqQikxvE= Message-ID: <9e4733910807301327k4f7e9d38h2453d46b98750c05@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:27:46 -0400 From: "Jon Smirl" To: "Rene Herman" Subject: Re: 463 kernel developers missing! Cc: "Linus Torvalds" , "Adrian Bunk" , "Stefan Richter" , "Paul Mundt" , "James Morris" , "Randy Dunlap" , "Dave Jones" , "Theodore Tso" , "Simon Arlott" , lkml In-Reply-To: <4890CDF4.3010407@keyaccess.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <488EF377.5080603@keyaccess.nl> <20080730072448.GB1564@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <4890284E.3050806@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20080730124650.GB19966@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <4890646D.3060000@keyaccess.nl> <20080730153247.GA21597@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <4890C3D0.6070306@keyaccess.nl> <4890CDF4.3010407@keyaccess.nl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1227 Lines: 34 On 7/30/08, Rene Herman wrote: > On 30-07-08 21:41, Rene Herman wrote: > > > > So, if you were doing more than responding to Adrian's DCO worry here > (which I do not share) the above is what I have against harvesting the > addresses into a _way_ too public place/format. It's a matter of scale; as > opposed to the SCM metadata, your tree itself is way too public to put > anything in without very definite and explicit approval. I feel. > > > > This, Jon, by the way also suggests something which I would consider much > better; _keep_ it as SCM metadata in some less-accesible format under .git/ The decision to keep it in .mailmap format was made before I was involved. A smaller .mailmap has been in the tree since 2007. Existing tools will need to be changed if the location is moved. > > I doubt anyone's going to come up with an objection then. It's already in > that exact same spot after all. > > Rene. > -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/