Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 02:05:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 02:04:57 -0500 Received: from jhuml4.jhu.edu ([128.220.2.67]:33751 "EHLO jhuml4.jhu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 02:04:50 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 01:32:55 -0500 (EST) From: afei@jhu.edu Subject: difference between kernel and bios report on drive status In-Reply-To: To: andre@linux-ide.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fei Liu Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi there: I am using PROMISE ultra100 with 2 UDMA66 disks. The PROMIS bios reports that both disks are using UDMA 4. But during kernel boot On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: up, the master disk is using UDMA 2 only. The reason is that master disk's pci->dma_ultra value is only 0x40f. I hacked the kernel a bit, both hard disk using hardware configued udma_four though. So I am wondering why not use udma_four as mode indication? Anyone here knows or I have to email Andre on this? By the way, mode4 works much faster.(hdparm -tT): disk1: udma33, mode2, disk buffer read 14MB/s disk2: udma66, mode4, disk buffer read 24MB/s both disks: buffer-cache read 88MB/s The second disk is only 5400RPM, the first one is 7200RPM. Both comply > > HOW? to UDMA66. How come the 2nd one is UDMA66, but the first one is > > > No performance loss, RAM is always fully utilized (except if no swap), UDMA33? And how come the 2nd is faster than the first one. I hope this is not a kernel bug. Fei - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/