Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755262AbYGaHdt (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:33:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753292AbYGaHdl (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:33:41 -0400 Received: from mga10.intel.com ([192.55.52.92]:45955 "EHLO fmsmga102.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753224AbYGaHdk (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:33:40 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,284,1215414000"; d="scan'208";a="366677596" Subject: Re: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 From: "Zhang, Yanmin" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <1217474425.25608.150.camel@ymzhang> References: <1217474425.25608.150.camel@ymzhang> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:31:03 +0800 Message-Id: <1217489463.25608.157.camel@ymzhang> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.21.5 (2.21.5-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1588 Lines: 46 On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 11:20 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > Ingo, > > volanoMark has regression with 2.6.27-rc1. > 1) 70% on 16-core tigerton; > 2) 18% on a new multi-core+HT mahcine; > > I tried to use git bisect to locate the root cause, but git bisect always went > back to 2.6.26. Then, I used my mechanical bisect script linearly to locate below commit: > > commit 82638844d9a8581bbf33201cc209a14876eca167 > Merge: 9982fbf... 63cf13b... > Author: Ingo Molnar > Date: Wed Jul 16 00:29:07 2008 +0200 > > Merge branch 'linus' into cpus4096 > > Conflicts: > > arch/x86/xen/smp.c > kernel/sched_rt.c > net/iucv/iucv.c > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar > > > > But if I use 'git show 82638844d9a8581bbf33201cc209a14876eca167', it looks like I could only > get a part of the patch. If I use web to acces the commit, I could get a big patch. As it's > a merge, what're commit numbers of the subpatches? > > > BTW, sysbench+mysql(oltp readonly) has about 15% regression, but git bisect looks crazy again. Oh, it looks like they are the old issues in 2.6.26-rc1 and the 2 patches were reverted before 2.6.26. New patches are merged into 2.6.27-rc1, but the issues are still not resolved clearly. http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0805.2/1148.html. yanmin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/