Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756203AbYGaHjb (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:39:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754021AbYGaHjQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:39:16 -0400 Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.22]:52589 "EHLO viefep19-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753780AbYGaHjO (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:39:14 -0400 X-SourceIP: 80.57.229.25 Subject: Re: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Zhang, Yanmin" Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML In-Reply-To: <1217489463.25608.157.camel@ymzhang> References: <1217474425.25608.150.camel@ymzhang> <1217489463.25608.157.camel@ymzhang> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:39:09 +0200 Message-Id: <1217489949.8157.78.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1940 Lines: 51 On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 15:31 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 11:20 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > Ingo, > > > > volanoMark has regression with 2.6.27-rc1. > > 1) 70% on 16-core tigerton; > > 2) 18% on a new multi-core+HT mahcine; > > > > I tried to use git bisect to locate the root cause, but git bisect always went > > back to 2.6.26. Then, I used my mechanical bisect script linearly to locate below commit: > > > > commit 82638844d9a8581bbf33201cc209a14876eca167 > > Merge: 9982fbf... 63cf13b... > > Author: Ingo Molnar > > Date: Wed Jul 16 00:29:07 2008 +0200 > > > > Merge branch 'linus' into cpus4096 > > > > Conflicts: > > > > arch/x86/xen/smp.c > > kernel/sched_rt.c > > net/iucv/iucv.c > > > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar > > > > > > > > But if I use 'git show 82638844d9a8581bbf33201cc209a14876eca167', it looks like I could only > > get a part of the patch. If I use web to acces the commit, I could get a big patch. As it's > > a merge, what're commit numbers of the subpatches? > > > > > > BTW, sysbench+mysql(oltp readonly) has about 15% regression, but git bisect looks crazy again. > Oh, it looks like they are the old issues in 2.6.26-rc1 and the 2 patches were reverted before 2.6.26. > New patches are merged into 2.6.27-rc1, but the issues are still not resolved clearly. > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0805.2/1148.html. The new smp-group stuff doesn't remotely look like what was in .26 Also, on my quad (admittedly smaller than your machines) both volano and sysbench didn't regress anymore - where they clearly did with the code reverted from .26. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/