Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:07:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:06:53 -0500 Received: from ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu ([129.137.3.94]:4536 "EHLO ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:06:40 -0500 Message-ID: <3C508600.25AF021@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:09:04 -0500 From: ken X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-10 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.17 multiple Oops and file corruption on I845 MB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Folks, Well, I guess I'm not the only one who has ever had egg on his face after posting a bug report. Before posting the report, I had run memtest86 v2.5.1 for more than one complete pass of the std tests and had concluded the memory was OK. On a hunch, after a reply from Mark Hahn, I let it run all night; after 17 hours running all tests over 3+ passes, it recorded about 4000 errors. These were clustered around 64MB and 135MB (64K and 4K holes, respectively), and I think that adequately accounts for the problems I was having on large file copies. The guy who sold me the hardware took it all back and refunded my money rather than having to learn something about linux, so I guess he didn't deserve the sale after all. Thanks again to all who read and responded. Now I know to run multiple passes on memtest before deciding things are OK.... Ken - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/