Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:39:02 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: ml@mareichelt.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25.13
Message-ID: <20080801063902.GA9281@suse.de>
References: <20080728180740.GA28669@kroah.com> <20080731232235.GD10067@tatooine.rebelbase.local> <20080801050214.GE615@1wt.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080801050214.GE615@1wt.eu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 963
Lines: 30

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 07:02:14AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> 
> [ please keep people in CC: ]
> 
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 01:22:35AM +0200, markus reichelt wrote:
> > * Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch
> > > between 2.6.25.12 and 2.6.25.13
> > 
> > Given that the official patches are signed, how about signing such
> > mails as well?

With what key?

Do you trust my personal key?  If so, why?  What trust does it imply to
you that my email message doesn't?  Why not trust the signature on the
kernel.org server instead?

Also, it makes actually applying patches in the mail a pain, trust me,
I've tried it in the past.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/