Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758580AbYHAMVz (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:21:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754016AbYHAMVs (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:21:48 -0400 Received: from outbound-va3.frontbridge.com ([216.32.180.16]:9327 "EHLO VA3EHSOBE005.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753855AbYHAMVq (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:21:46 -0400 X-BigFish: VPS-11(zz1432R1805Mzz10d3izzz32i6bh8ah43j62h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 1:0 X-FB-SS: 5, X-WSS-ID: 0K4X8ZY-01-JAF-01 Message-ID: <4892FFC1.4060600@amd.com> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:21:21 +0200 From: Peter Oruba Organization: AMD (OSRC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080720) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Adamushko CC: Tigran Aivazian , Max Krasnyansky , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , LKML Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] x86: AMD microcode patch loading v2 fixes References: <20080729154103.007575982@amd.com> <488F581B.7060009@qualcomm.com> <48903431.9060707@amd.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2008 12:21:21.0534 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B82F1E0:01C8F3D1] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1681 Lines: 45 Dmitry Adamushko schrieb: > Tigran, Peter, > > > may a firmware package contain a few 'microcode' updates for a specific cpu? > > And if so, does each of them provide independent 'errata' fixes? [*] > > (or they are just different versions of the same self-consistent/full > 'microcode' update and we may need to apply each of them just e.g. > because we can't jump from stepping X.1 to X.3 without applying X.2 in > between? > > if it's [1], then I wonder why only a single 'microcode' update (which > has been previously cached in 'uci->mc') is being applied for the case > of system-wide resume (apply_microcode_check_cpu()). Don't we need to > go through the full cpu_request_microcode() cycle to consider all > updates? > > > TIA, > Dmitry, to answer your question for the AMD part: ucode patches are always combo-patches. A ucode patch for a particular CPU revision solves all targeted issues at once. There is no case in which two or more ucode patches would be applied to a CPU. Peter -- | AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896 Research | General Partner authorized to represent: Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US) | General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/