Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:35:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:35:40 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:11013 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:35:28 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 01:35:08 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Cc: Subject: Re: 2.4.18pre4aa1 In-Reply-To: <20020124222357.C901@earthlink.net> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 rwhron@earthlink.net wrote: > > It would be interesting to see the dbench dots from both > > -aa and -rmap ;) > > All the dots are at: > http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/dots/ I think we have an explanation here. With dbench 192 on -aa the first processes exit around halfway through the dbench test and around the end only few processes are left. With rmap the write trottling is a bit smoother, but this results in all processes running to about 70% through the test and many more processes running at the last part of the test, exiting simultaneously. Considering the possible bad consequences for real workloads, I'm not sure I want to make the system more unfair just to better accomodate dbench ;) regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/