Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759616AbYHBUFV (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:05:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756636AbYHBUFK (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:05:10 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:2373 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754546AbYHBUFJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:05:09 -0400 Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:04:49 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Oliver Pinter , Abdel Benamrouche , stable@kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC, 2.6.26.2-rc1] fs/partition/check.c: fix return value warning Message-ID: <20080802200448.GH615@1wt.eu> References: <200808022202.48079.oliver.pntr@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 658 Lines: 16 On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 12:56:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Please don't just send patches to the stable team because they "look > fine". They should be real bugs, with real consequences. And no, a > compiler warning is not a real consequence. BTW, before Oliver does the mistake, I'd suggest never forwarding network patches to stable either as Davem already maintains his own -stable queue ;-) Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/