Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:01:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:01:28 -0500 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:44677 "HELO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:01:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:58:44 +0100 (CET) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: To: Cc: jfv , linux-kernel , jstultz Subject: Re: [PATCH]: O(1) 2.4.17-J6 tuneable parameters In-Reply-To: <200201250518.g0P5IrR13332@Bluesong.NET> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Jack F. Vogel wrote: > Have been watching and testing your changes as they have > evolved. Our group has a customer request for a scheduler that will > give them some tuneable parameters, and your changes have actually had > some parameters change thru the deltas you've made. It seemed like it > might be useful to take them and make them tweakable on a running > system. I am not 100% convinced of the goodness of this, but I wanted > to submit it for your consideration. The current code performs great > btw, thanks for all your hard work. i'm using something like this, hence the structured extraction of all relevant parameters in -J6. It's very useful for testing. We do not want to slow down the scheduler with runtime parameters though (and it's just way too easy to change fundamental behavior of the scheduler by changing the paramters), so this should definitely remain a development-helper patch. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/