Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:31:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:31:52 -0500 Received: from [202.87.41.13] ([202.87.41.13]:25271 "HELO postfix.baazee.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:31:36 -0500 Message-ID: <018401c1a57a$e8102590$3c00a8c0@baazee.com> Reply-To: "Anish Srivastava" From: "Anish Srivastava" To: "Andrew Morton" Cc: , , "Andrea Arcangeli" , "Rik van Riel" , In-Reply-To: <008301c1a4c1$a79f8fa0$3c00a8c0@baazee.com> <3C5076C1.DDEE200B@zip.com.au> Subject: Re: kernel 2.4.17 with -rmap VM patch ROCKS!!! Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:02:58 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The fact that the current stable version of the Linux kernel > can only achieve an eight-hour uptime on this class of machine > is a fairly serious problem, don't we all agree? > > We need a fix for 2.4.18. > > Did you test the -aa patches? No, I havent tried the aa patches. I belive the aa patches are to be integrated in the 2.4.18 official stable release. Since I am quite happy with the performance of my machine with the rmap patch......I will leave it as it is. Though, for your information I will be checking out the aa patches on my backup machine which is also of the same class. I will let you guys know the performance with the aa patches incorporated as soon as I set it up on the other machine. Regards, Anish - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/