Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 09:44:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 09:44:08 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:34826 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 09:43:59 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 14:13:44 +0000 From: Philipp Rumpf To: Alan Cox Cc: georgn@home.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Message-ID: <20001126141344.T2272@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <14880.29022.261932.284497@somanetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 04:25:05AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 04:25:05AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > static int a=0; > > says 'I thought about this. I want it to start at zero. I've written it this > way to remind of the fact' > > Sure it generates the same code I agree it would be best if gcc would generate the same code; unfortunately this doesn't seem to be the case, which sounds like something to take up with the gcc developers. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/