Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758097AbYHDOcj (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:32:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755817AbYHDOcA (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:32:00 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:44716 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755698AbYHDOb7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:31:59 -0400 Message-ID: <489712DB.80502@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 07:31:55 -0700 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dhaval Giani , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] dyn_array and nr_irqs support v3 References: <1217732365-16595-1-git-send-email-yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> <86802c440808022304g41749d9dn7688c81c3fdbed8a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1449 Lines: 42 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Yinghai Lu" writes: > >> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Eric W. Biederman >> wrote: >>> It appears that quite a few of the places you have changed are testing >>> to see if an irq is valid. The idiomatic way to perform that test in >>> the kernel is: >>> >>> if (irq) >> is uninitialized irq to be -1 or 0? > > 0. There is a long history behind it, but by decree of Linus and to conform > with reasonable intuition 0 is not a valid irq except in certain arch specific > corner cases. > >>> With no test to see if you are >= NR_IRQS. >>> >>> I expect that is the change we want in the drivers that are performing such a >> silly >>> extra check. >> is_irq_valid(irq_no) ? >> >> wait to see your new patchset about dyn irq_cfg and irq_desc > > I haven't promised one, at least not lately. I went down a couple of > blind alleys and figured out what needed to be accomplished and then > ran out of steam about a year and a half 2 years ago, and I haven't > been able to get back to it. > > Eric I've put this on my queue of "items to examine more closely". Priority-wise, it's not quite at the front yet. Thanks, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/