Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:03:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:02:52 -0500 Received: from h24-77-26-115.gv.shawcable.net ([24.77.26.115]:43906 "EHLO phalynx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:02:43 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Ryan Cumming To: Horst von Brand , "Moore, Robert" Subject: Re: [ACPI] ACPI mentioned on lwn.net/kernel Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:02:32 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.8] Cc: "Therien, Guy" , "Grover, Andrew" , "'lwn@lwn.net'" , "Acpi-linux (E-mail)" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" In-Reply-To: <200201251550.g0PFoIPa002738@tigger.cs.uni-dortmund.de> In-Reply-To: <200201251550.g0PFoIPa002738@tigger.cs.uni-dortmund.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200201250802.32508.bodnar42@phalynx.dhs.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On January 25, 2002 07:50, Horst von Brand wrote: > > Given that the MS VC compiler consistently generates IA-32 code that is > > over 30% smaller than GCC, I would have to say that Linux would benefit > > far more by directing all of the energy spent complaining about code size > > toward optimizing the compiler. > > Is it faster too? Or at least not slower? If not, what is the point? Storing 30% less executable pages in memory? Reading 30% less executable pages off the disk? Performing 30% less relocations? -Ryan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/