Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 10:45:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 10:45:19 -0500 Received: from [209.249.10.20] ([209.249.10.20]:49287 "EHLO freya.yggdrasil.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 10:45:09 -0500 From: "Adam J. Richter" Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 07:15:08 -0800 Message-Id: <200011261515.HAA09753@baldur.yggdrasil.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Is there some reason why gcc does not put static data that is explicitly initialized to zero in .bss? If not, then fixing gcc would provide more space savings than these patches, and improve more software than just the Linux kernel. Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104 adam@yggdrasil.com \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034 +1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/