Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:04:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:03:53 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:1811 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:03:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:03:16 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: David Weinehall Cc: , Subject: Re: 2.4.18pre4aa1 In-Reply-To: <20020125061801.W1735@khan.acc.umu.se> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, David Weinehall wrote: > One thing that struck me about this; doesn't both the rmap-patches and > the aa-patches contain other changes than merely changes to the VM? If > so, couldn't these changes tip the result in an unfair direction?! After > all, what we want is a VM-to-VM shoot-out, not a VM-to-VM+whatever > shoot-out. After all, one would assume that the non VM-related changes > would be merged to the kernel no matter what VM is used, right? The -aa kernel seems to contain patches to a few dozen subsystems. The -rmap patch is pretty much only VM changes. You're right that this is not a strict VM vs VM comparison... kind regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/