Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760541AbYHEOeb (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:34:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755178AbYHEOeW (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:34:22 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:35385 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754453AbYHEOeV (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:34:21 -0400 Message-ID: <489864BD.1060005@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:33:33 -0500 From: Christoph Lameter User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dobriyan CC: Pekka Enberg , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] SLUB: detach SLUB_DEBUG and SYSFS References: <20080801000405.GA7072@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> <48941C2F.8010406@cs.helsinki.fi> <489702B9.5030204@linux-foundation.org> <48970DDD.4040607@cs.helsinki.fi> <20080804220247.GA10159@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080804220247.GA10159@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1390 Lines: 38 Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 05:10:37PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> Christoph Lameter wrote: >>> Pekka Enberg wrote: >>>> Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >>>>> Right now, SYSFS=n means no SLUB debugging, no even basic poisoning, >>>>> to hell with tunables. >>>> Applied, thanks! >>> Do not apply. This partially reverts an earlier commit and would cause >>> build >>> issues because the #ifdef parts in slub.c were not reverted. >> Aww, crap. OK, taking it out. > > OK, I'll test-compile it to death. Not sure what the point would be. If you look at the commit you are reverting then its clear what configurations will break, > For now, do you agree that SYSFS=n users shouldn't be discriminated > against poisoning? If you want a minimal memory footprint then I thought that also implies that the debug code would not be compiled in? > As real world situation, NET_NS feature which is currently in > active development doesn't work with SYSFS, so it was a bit of cold > shower to realise that I did much testing of conntracking in netns > without poisoning. :-( Ohh.. There are kernel features that conflict with SYSFS? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/