Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761820AbYHER6d (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:58:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754925AbYHER6Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:58:25 -0400 Received: from smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.216]:24036 "HELO smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754560AbYHER6Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:58:24 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=lJE4Xbnkr0PeUTC/2aOYFuvVdVk+3bmLwmOhjmif6aE0gNdbluAkIX9sNu2r9IblWBHeBH4HCW5ofUySolrE44cfSAgON38umFvXSvRQpCsHUeJ3UuposwJ96cwsywT4C2T+GTxJp7QkhYsriOMbvN3xe+jRT/oLz2DDrQWy0sY= ; X-YMail-OSG: gBGVwBkVM1n0Nx2q8sS9YRp9dVMkyt4RRG0uz0etxqf1Ep2ULAqihZ34GuoOAMPcKK9fUEUIshqoAhrRBicjFWWBMKRyB98tFAExdLJIGOhGBMse0FMNcsMBZ6RfvUxMS1o- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 03:58:11 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Eric Paris , Greg KH , malware-list@lists.printk.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1217883616.27684.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080805005415.GA10108@infradead.org> <20080805123136.0073e52f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20080805123136.0073e52f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808060358.11643.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 894 Lines: 20 On Tuesday 05 August 2008 21:31, Alan Cox wrote: > > No, I want a sane security policy in kernelsapce that doesn't look > > at the content because doing security by content properly is equivalent > > to solving the halting problem. I couldn't give a rats a** about > > windows viruses as they can't actually cause any harm on a Linux > > machine. > > Go on then.. post patches. Onus is not (or actually often is, but should not) be on reviewers to do this. That effectively further reduces review bandwidth. I can see why "feature" writers like the idea though. Either they get someone to do their work for them, or negative reviews disappear :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/