Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763358AbYHEXoj (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:44:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755190AbYHEXoQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:44:16 -0400 Received: from [116.90.133.99] ([116.90.133.99]:49099 "EHLO mars.unix.geek.nz" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753018AbYHEXoP (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:44:15 -0400 Subject: Re: XFS noikeep remount in 2.6.27-rc1-next-20080730 From: Jasper Bryant-Greene To: Dave Chinner Cc: Karel Zak , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, util-linux-ng@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080805233956.GI21635@disturbed> References: <1217553598.3860.16.camel@luna.unix.geek.nz> <20080801073033.GF6201@disturbed> <20080801193133.GA838@lst.de> <20080805110357.GL21873@nb.net.home> <20080805233956.GI21635@disturbed> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Amiton Ltd Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:44:22 +1200 Message-Id: <1217979862.2887.39.camel@luna.unix.geek.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1508 Lines: 35 On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 09:39 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > We're seeing the second case where mount is merging all the options in > /etc/fstab into the options passed into the remount command. How is > the filesystem expected to behave in these difference cases? The > first simply changes the ro/rw status, the second potentially > asks for the filesystem to change a bunch of other mount options > as well, which it may not be able to do. > > So what is the correct behaviour? Should the filesystem *silently > ignore* unchangable options in the remount command, or should it > fail the remount and warn the user that certain options are not > allowed in remount? (forgive me, I'm an XFS user, not an XFS developer, so this might be ignorant) The filesystem presumably knows what options it was originally mounted with. Thus if you take the difference of the set of options you were mounted with, and the set of options you are now being asked to remount with, you have the options which are being asked to change. If changing any of them is unsupported I would expect an error, but in this case the result of taking the above set difference would be merely replacing ro with rw, and thus the filesystem is presumably capable of doing the remount. -jasper -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/