Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762212AbYHEXtR (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:49:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755337AbYHEXtE (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:49:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42840 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754938AbYHEXtC (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:49:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro toalinuxinterfaceforonaccess scanning From: Eric Paris To: Al Viro Cc: Greg KH , "Press, Jonathan" , Theodore Tso , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, malware-list@lists.printk.net, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080805233743.GK28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <2629CC4E1D22A64593B02C43E85553030480743B@USILMS12.ca.com> <20080805181141.GA10700@kroah.com> <2629CC4E1D22A64593B02C43E85553030480743F@USILMS12.ca.com> <20080805185438.GA8453@mit.edu> <2629CC4E1D22A64593B02C43E855530304AE4ADB@USILMS12.ca.com> <20080805211445.GA28304@kroah.com> <2629CC4E1D22A64593B02C43E855530304AE4ADC@USILMS12.ca.com> <20080805214415.GA5830@kroah.com> <2629CC4E1D22A64593B02C43E855530303E21D47@USILMS12.ca.com> <20080805222638.GA6395@kroah.com> <20080805233743.GK28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:48:52 -0400 Message-Id: <1217980132.27684.203.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1406 Lines: 32 On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 00:37 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 03:26:38PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:12:34PM -0400, Press, Jonathan wrote: > > > Sorry for the top-post... but I give up. > > > > > > I don't think I'm stupid, but frankly I don't understand the point of > > > the questions being asked in the last three responses to my statement. > > > I don't know why they are relevant, and I don't know how to answer > > > them in a framework that we can all understand at the same time. > > Excuse me? One of those questions had been a very specific yes-or-no one > and I certainly hope that we all can understand either answer to such... > > For the record, the question is > > "Do you or do you not expect the malware to be active on scanning host?" I do believe for a number of AV vendors the answer is yes. I will try to have some offline conversations with the right people at a number of vendors and work to better define the threats that they wish to or believe they are able to help mitigate. -Eric > I hope that relevance of that to the analysis of software involved in > scanning should be obvious. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/