Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:58:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:58:25 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:60422 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:57:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:57:06 +0100 (CET) From: Dave Jones To: Alan Cox Cc: Linus Torvalds , Martin Wilck , Linux Kernel mailing list , Richard Gooch , Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Fix MTRR handling on HT CPUs (improved) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > just not do it on the right CPU (you're _not_ supposed to read to see if > > you are writing the same value: MTRR's can at least in theory have > > side-effects, so it's not the same check as for the microcode update). > So why not just set it twice - surely that is harmless ? Why add complex > code ? I wondered the same thing of the microcode changes. Since for the commoncase (ie, non-HT) it now has the side-effect of doing this.. microcode: CPU0 updated from revision 7 to 7, date-10151999 which looks odd in comparison to the old "already current" msg. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/