Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:06:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:06:37 -0500 Received: from h24-77-26-115.gv.shawcable.net ([24.77.26.115]:10371 "EHLO phalynx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:06:20 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Ryan Cumming To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [ACPI] ACPI mentioned on lwn.net/kernel Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:05:55 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.8] Cc: Horst von Brand , "Moore, Robert" , "Therien, Guy" , "Grover, Andrew" , "'lwn@lwn.net'" , "Acpi-linux (E-mail)" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" In-Reply-To: <200201251550.g0PFoIPa002738@tigger.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <200201250802.32508.bodnar42@phalynx.dhs.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200201251205.55440.bodnar42@phalynx.dhs.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On January 25, 2002 08:15, Andreas Schwab wrote: > These are all startup costs that are lost in the noise the longer the > program runs. Executable size is -not- just a startup cost. Larger executables will have a bigger memory footprint and less cache locality. A KDE desktop on 64megs of memory would be noticably more responsive if GCC generated executables the same size as VC++, due to less swap thrashing alone. -Ryan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/