Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759756AbYHFUeA (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:34:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757463AbYHFUbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:31:12 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]:51784 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755924AbYHFUbK (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:31:10 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=xirggKiE1hscViDUnDDDUgOCP01M1IMYqkfWx7/AL1QtKfHDdvI6nU0cXi78VJTaA sA/zBHnWmthffJ868fG9A== Message-ID: <6599ad830808061330j41f2141fva8395239726f5f7f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:30:54 -0700 From: "Paul Menage" To: "Paul Jackson" Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (2.6.27-rc1) Cc: "Max Krasnyansky" , mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, vegard.nossum@gmail.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com In-Reply-To: <20080806152910.9e4f76a2.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1217631552-22129-1-git-send-email-maxk@qualcomm.com> <20080805180521.be7010e1.pj@sgi.com> <48991973.90109@qualcomm.com> <20080805222927.6dd95f5f.pj@sgi.com> <4899202B.6030303@qualcomm.com> <20080805232856.78dd50f7.pj@sgi.com> <489930B5.9030906@qualcomm.com> <20080806004629.d321f3b0.pj@sgi.com> <489A079E.5040903@qualcomm.com> <20080806152910.9e4f76a2.pj@sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 776 Lines: 20 On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Paul Jackson wrote: > Max K wrote: >> Sure. That looks fine. Although inline_ will probably be a bit confusing >> since one may think that it has something to do with the C 'inline'. >> I'd suggest either sync_rebuild_sched_domains() or simply >> rebuild_sched_domains(). > > Good point about "inline" confusions. > > I am willing to agree to "sync_rebuild_sched_domains()". I'd vote in favour of Max's suggestion of just rebuild_sched_domains(), to localize the changes better. Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/