Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761654AbYHFUgr (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:36:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756056AbYHFUgf (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:36:35 -0400 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:59070 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755971AbYHFUge (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:36:34 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5200,2160,5355"; a="5204177" Message-ID: <489A0B4F.2020803@qualcomm.com> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:36:31 -0700 From: Max Krasnyansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Jackson CC: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, vegard.nossum@gmail.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (2.6.27-rc1) References: <1217631552-22129-1-git-send-email-maxk@qualcomm.com> <20080802063900.6615e5ca.pj@sgi.com> <48948C3A.6050805@qualcomm.com> <20080802225127.2b0d138b.pj@sgi.com> <4895F3ED.4020805@qualcomm.com> <20080804010033.0d1b0549.pj@sgi.com> <48977E81.4040207@qualcomm.com> <20080804225636.541527e8.pj@sgi.com> <4898B873.6000308@qualcomm.com> <20080805180521.be7010e1.pj@sgi.com> <48991973.90109@qualcomm.com> <20080805222927.6dd95f5f.pj@sgi.com> <4899202B.6030303@qualcomm.com> <20080805232856.78dd50f7.pj@sgi.com> <489930B5.9030906@qualcomm.com> <20080806004629.d321f3b0.pj@sgi.com> <489A079E.5040903@qualcomm.com> <20080806152910.9e4f76a2.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080806152910.9e4f76a2.pj@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 677 Lines: 19 Paul Jackson wrote: > Max K wrote: >> Sure. That looks fine. Although inline_ will probably be a bit confusing >> since one may think that it has something to do with the C 'inline'. >> I'd suggest either sync_rebuild_sched_domains() or simply >> rebuild_sched_domains(). > > Good point about "inline" confusions. > > I am willing to agree to "sync_rebuild_sched_domains()". Thank you. I'll go ahead and respin the patch. Max -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/