Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762725AbYHFUok (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:44:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761590AbYHFUoT (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:44:19 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:43499 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757753AbYHFUoP (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:44:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:43:14 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jean Delvare Cc: mhoffman@lightlink.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] hwmon updates against v2.6.26 Message-Id: <20080806134314.5afaae69.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080806200301.6597e42d@hyperion.delvare> References: <20080801041026.GI3375@mars.solarsys.private> <20080806103903.6b9eec76@hyperion.delvare> <20080806085324.58d65849.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080806200301.6597e42d@hyperion.delvare> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2156 Lines: 46 On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:03:01 +0200 Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 08:53:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:39:03 +0200 Jean Delvare wrote: > > > I have a number of hwmon patches in my local kernel tree which I wrote > > > and that have been reviewed by a trusted developer, or that have been > > > posted to the lm-sensors list and that I have reviewed. I consider > > > these ready to go upstream. I plan to gather these into a public tree > > > and push them to Linus today or tomorrow. In the future, I will > > > probably have such a tree available to be included in linux-next. > > > > > > Don't get me wrong, I am _not_ volunteering to become the new hwmon > > > subsystem maintainer. Remember, I've been there before and you know how > > > it ended. But in the absence of a subsystem maintainer, I don't want > > > hwmon patches to be lost (and especially not mine) and I don't think > > > that pushing everything to Andrew is a good solution either. So I'm > > > just proposing to do my part of the work. But if Andrew really prefers > > > to pick all the patches, I am not insisting either. > > > > That would be great, thanks. > > > > But it does mean that I'd prefer that any hwmon patches which I pick up > > are merged via that tree if that's OK. Which all does end up making > > you look awfully like an hwmon maintainer.. > > No, that's not OK, sorry. This goes beyond what I can offer at this > point in time. > > I offered to push selected patches to Linus, with no other guarantee > than the fact that said patches have been carefully reviewed and are > believed to be correct. I do not have the time to do more than that. > > If this isn't OK with you, then I will have to withdraw my proposal. > It's up to you. Ah, I see, this tree is only things-which-Jean-wrote. No probs here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/