Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755234AbYHGQrz (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:47:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752778AbYHGQrp (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:47:45 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-35.bluehost.com ([69.89.18.155]:39571 "HELO outbound-mail-35.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752684AbYHGQro (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:47:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User; b=QX2FoJEAUKD2xmmCwZGdsrgtnLQx7tM9t7gW/YF1OTfrj4JeA2YidICpZ4RXKSRCjLn2J3y+vphINemwlMgDshTtEFk2pqryleAcsg9sa/EOMcxhdR1Uj9uffiL5xZ2v; From: Jesse Barnes To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: "e100_probe: Error clearing wake event" when booting 2.6.27-rc1 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:47:37 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Alessandro Guido , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pm list References: <200808051730.27599.alessandro.guido@gmail.com> <200808052203.07815.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200808052203.07815.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808070947.37534.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1076 Lines: 33 On Tuesday, August 5, 2008 1:03 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 5 of August 2008, Alessandro Guido wrote: > > [please cc me on replies] > > > > I'm getting this error message when booting my laptop. > > > > The commit that causes this is: > > > > commit eb9d0fe40e313c0a74115ef456a2e43a6c8da72f > > Author: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Date: Mon Jul 7 03:34:48 2008 +0200 > > > > PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up > > > > [very long commit message snipped] > > > > Should I ignore that? > > The message is harmless, but it exposes the problem that e100_probe() > should not use pci_enable_wake() for this purpose. > > The appended patch makes it use pci_pme_active() instead. I can take the pci_pme_active bits, but the e100 stuff should go in through Jeff probably. Care to respin? Thanks, Jesse -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/