Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754290AbYHGQzJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:55:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752002AbYHGQy6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:54:58 -0400 Received: from 166-70-238-42.ip.xmission.com ([166.70.238.42]:58011 "EHLO ns1.wolfmountaingroup.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751147AbYHGQy6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:54:58 -0400 Message-ID: <1905.69.2.248.210.1218126817.squirrel@webmail.wolfmountaingroup.com> In-Reply-To: <489B26F0.3030603@s5r6.in-berlin.de> References: <1300.69.2.248.210.1218119365.squirrel@webmail.wolfmountaingroup.com> <489B199B.40305@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <489B1BDC.1010504@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <1923.69.2.248.210.1218124570.squirrel@webmail.wolfmountaingroup.com> <489B26F0.3030603@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:33:37 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mdb-2.6.27-rc2-ia32-08-07-08.patch From: jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com To: "Stefan Richter" Cc: jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1316 Lines: 32 > jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com wrote: >> rspin locks are for these types of cases -- so if I fault on the same >> processor I took the lock on it just bumps a counter -- yes, it is >> atomic >> and SMP safe to do it this way. > > Only if all contexts which take rlocks are not preemptible. Which I > don't know whether they are; I'm just a driver guy. You use > spin_lock_irqsave() rather than plain spin_lock() though, which > indicates that you want to be able to take the locks from preemptible > contexts too. In that case, your accessors are subtly buggy. > -- > Stefan Richter > -=====-==--- =--- --=== > http://arcgraph.de/sr/ > check mdb-main.c -- I disable preemption before rspin_lock is attempted. Since the only processor which sets the proc number does do inside the spin lock, and the other processors only read it, unless memory is corrupted or the machine is severely broken, its SMP safe to this. I use the debug_lock rspin_lock to prevent the other processors from entering the debugger command console when one of them has the console... Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/