Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 12:11:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 12:11:13 -0500 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com ([207.175.42.154]:53847 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 12:11:00 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 16:40:58 +0000 From: Tim Waugh To: John Cavan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.0test11ac4 Message-ID: <20001126164058.B23819@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3A203F0A.29336B56@home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A203F0A.29336B56@home.com>; from johncavan@home.com on Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 05:36:58PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 05:36:58PM -0500, John Cavan wrote: > Just so I understand the differences, for learning purposes... Tim > did this a little different than I did and I'd just like to > understand the "whys" of it. It's Douglas Gilbert's modified patch; Douglas explained that he didn't find that dropping the io_request_lock for just parport_enumerate was enough during his testing. Tim. */ --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6IT0ZONXnILZ4yVIRAmIVAJ0VeM9a9NXUZHBMVAbmtaHw+a4nnQCePRls WX6Q2j3wexfn3pAH+OXVpoE= =tROU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/