Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755402AbYHHIlA (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:41:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753465AbYHHIkw (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:40:52 -0400 Received: from smtp119.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.84.76]:47094 "HELO smtp119.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753401AbYHHIkv (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:40:51 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=XPgTHyRjDFUc9Bhy6ubYPatetGKsa+Hv1rkfVh2VK0xejOEAsRJaSuvip8dD9fjHvVNqDEFRytWcI57DUUJi8n2aZt6FrzUfbLQ6oxFH9Yx4gNRGT++Z0NeSNVMNkiutWfcUg4MBOcbajf6f8IcrBCAXvSyrbRxh3aY1ZaLZv2s= ; X-YMail-OSG: X7qLgO4VM1knzz09cByzcXquiMv4mDpvrf9rNcSl.6izzpZRpwchnkaf9HnvzpkM39_ADFXfRIqs9elBL24g8CmziWP8pVzHftQFCCCDNCgka8Q87IvWye6iRQHoLAVoaYc6WYapre1r3r1X8uOYOQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Merkey's Kernel Debugger Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:40:42 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Andi Kleen , jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Stefan Richter , Josh Boyer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <17494.166.70.238.46.1217784156.squirrel@webmail.wolfmountaingroup.com> <200808061550.22996.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <489B34BA.4060300@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <489B34BA.4060300@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808081840.42646.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 809 Lines: 19 On Friday 08 August 2008 03:45, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Nick Piggin wrote: > > OK thanks for the info. I don't actually know debugger code as I > > said, so I wasn't against merging mdb if it offers things that > > kgdb fundamentally cannot. > > > > If so, then ensuring clean interfaces indeed would seem like a > > good first step to getting it merged. > > The competing implementation is kdb not kgdb. kgdb is just a stub for > remote debugging using gdb. kdb is an in-kernel debugger like the one > proposed here. Yes, so Andi said a couple of days ago ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/