Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] allocate structures for reservation tracking in
	hugetlbfs outside of spinlocks v2
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-mm@kvack.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
       Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
In-Reply-To: <1218193855-25832-1-git-send-email-apw@shadowen.org>
References: <20080807143824.8e0803da.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	 <1218193855-25832-1-git-send-email-apw@shadowen.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:57:55 +0200
Message-Id: <1218200276.10315.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 626
Lines: 17

On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 12:10 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> [Bah, while reviewing the locking based on your previous email I spotted
> that we need to check the return from the vma_needs_reservation call for
> allocation errors.  Here is an updated patch to correct this.  This passes
> testing here.  Gerald could you test thing one too.]

Ok, it works here too.

Thanks,
Gerald


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/