Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752788AbYHHPFy (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:05:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753841AbYHHPFn (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:05:43 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:60953 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752305AbYHHPFm (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:05:42 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:06:02 -0500 From: Cliff Wickman To: Andi Kleen Cc: Vivek Goyal , Keith Owens , Jay Lan , Christoph Lameter , Stefan Richter , Nick Piggin , jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Josh Boyer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Takenori Nagano , Bernhard Walle Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Merkey's Kernel Debugger Message-ID: <20080808150602.GB20352@sgi.com> References: <20080807200659.GJ24801@one.firstfloor.org> <23175.1218148134@ocs10w> <20080808011500.GA531@redhat.com> <20080808022916.GM24801@one.firstfloor.org> <20080808120813.GA17364@sgi.com> <20080808122052.GA9038@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080808122052.GA9038@one.firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1288 Lines: 32 On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 02:20:52PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > In a partitioned system [I work for SGI, so I'm talking about an Altix], > > there is memory sharing among multiple single-system images. And if > > one of those partitions were to panic the other partitions need to > > be informed that they cannot address the panic'd partition's memory. > > (Once that partition is rebooted any such access will cause an MCA > > in the accessor.) > > There are already existing shutdown hooks. Aren't they good enough > for that? For shutdown, yes. But on a panic crash_kexec() gets called before the panic_notifier_list is run. > I would feel uneasy about having arbitary drivers hook into panic(). > While I'm sure your code is great there is unfortunately a lot > of crappy driver code around. That is Eric Biederman's concern as well. But it seems we should have a way for a user/customer to customize those events and their order, as I noted in a previous post. -- Cliff Wickman Silicon Graphics, Inc. cpw@sgi.com (651) 683-3824 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/