Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 05:24:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 05:24:10 -0500 Received: from tapu.cryptoapps.com ([63.108.153.39]:44985 "EHLO tapu.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 05:23:57 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 02:22:53 -0800 From: Chris Wedgwood To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel Message-ID: <20020126102253.GD4276@tapu.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <3C5047A2.1AB65595@mandrakesoft.com> <20020124223325.GA886@tapu.f00f.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 02:44:35PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Try inserting a compilation unit or other hard optimization boundary. Can you provide and example please? My trivial test comparing "int i, if (i)" verses "bool t, if (t)" shows the exact same code is produced --- what should I be looking at here? --cw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/