Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760154AbYHHQnh (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:43:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760035AbYHHQnE (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:43:04 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46595 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760023AbYHHQnD (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:43:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:41:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Peter Zijlstra cc: Andrew Morton , mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, marcin.slusarz@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq->lock and xtime lock In-Reply-To: <1218202249.8625.106.camel@twins> Message-ID: References: <20080324122424.671168000@chello.nl> <1206382547.6437.131.camel@lappy> <20080324115738.85c72bb5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1218202249.8625.106.camel@twins> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 423 Lines: 14 On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Something along the lines of the below patch? Could we not literally just make this a RCU event? Unconditionally too? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/