Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 12:20:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 12:20:52 -0500 Received: from zok.SGI.COM ([204.94.215.101]:52963 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 12:20:38 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 09:19:20 -0800 From: Jesse Barnes To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel Subject: Re: Ingo's O(1) scheduler vs. wait_init_idle Message-ID: <20020126091920.A6303@sgi.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Martin J. Bligh" , mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <154900000.1011894435@flay> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <154900000.1011894435@flay> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:47:15AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >> I was trying to test this in my 8 way NUMA box, but this patch seems > >> to have lost half of the wait_init_idle fix that I put in a while > >> back. [...] We had this same trouble on 4 to 12 way Itanium machines, but finally made them boot using a variation of your fix. That was with J7. It looks like the boot cpu gets stuck waiting for wait_init_idle to clear. We'll try to send out a patch on Monday. Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/